Re: pet peeves
Posted by:
vareth in silico (IP Logged)
Date: February 20, 2011 09:57PM
OOOH, I HAVE ONE, though I don't know if I'd call it a "pet" peeve because MOST PUBLISHED AUTHORS I READ HAVE THE SENSE NOT TO PULL CRAP LIKE THIS.
ARGH.
To avoid spoilers, I won't say which book it was. But basically, this book--which had decent writing, okay characterization, some "aww" moments but nothing, like, super-spectacular--was driven by the main character wondering, basically, who was telling him to do the stuff he was being told to do. Because he was being told in ways that were very personal to him (like, references to his childhood and stuff), and there wasn't really ANYONE who knew him that well in the whole world.
So, this whole book is written semi-realistically. By which I don't mean it was always totally believable, but that it was set in the real world, in the present, with no element of the supernatural EXCEPT the mystery of "who's behind it all?"
Which turned out to be the author.
Yes.
In the last chapter, the author WROTE HIMSELF INTO THE STORY, and EXPLAINED to the main character that HIS STORY WAS A MESSAGE TO EVERYONE.
To fully understand how BADLY this was done, a point of comparison:
I would sooner read Twilight. Because Twilight was not nearly so condescending to its audience.
So. Yeah. It'll become a pet peeve if I see it again.